Cartiva Implant Failure Lawsuit: Patient Rights, Risks, and Legal Options

Overview
The Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant was promoted as an innovative solution for patients suffering from big toe arthritis. Surgeons and manufacturers claimed it would reduce pain while preserving mobility. Unfortunately, for many patients, the outcome was far from promised.

An increasing number of individuals are now pursuing a Cartiva implant failure lawsuit, alleging that the device causes long-term pain, loss of function, and the need for additional surgeries.

This guide breaks down the Cartiva implant failure lawsuit in 2026, focusing on patient risks, warning signs, and legal rights.

How the Cartiva Implant Is Supposed to Work

The Cartiva implant is made from a water-based synthetic material designed to mimic natural cartilage. It is implanted into the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the big toe to relieve arthritis pain while maintaining joint movement.

However, many patients report that the implant fails to integrate properly, leading to mechanical breakdown inside the joint.

Reported Problems With the Cartiva Implant

Patients filing Cartiva implant failure lawsuits commonly describe the following complications:

• Implant compression or shrinkage.
• Bone-on-bone pain returning after surgery.
• Joint instability or stiffness.
• Inflammation and swelling that does not resolve.
• Difficulty walking, exercising, or standing for long periods.

These problems often worsen over time, leaving patients with fewer treatment options.

Warning Signs of Cartiva Implant Failure

If you have received a Cartiva implant, watch for these red flags:

• Pain that increases months after surgery.
• Limited toe movement or locking.
• Sharp pain when pushing off while walking.
• Swelling that persists despite treatment.
• Imaging showing loss of joint space.

Early detection may help prevent further joint damage.

Why Patients Are Taking Legal Action

The Cartiva implant failure lawsuit alleges that patients were misled about the device’s durability and safety. Key legal arguments include:

• The implant does not last as long as advertised.
• Long-term failure risks were underreported.
• Surgeons lacked sufficient warning information.
• Safer alternative treatments were not fully disclosed.

Many patients say they would have chosen joint fusion or other options if properly informed.

Who Can File a Cartiva Implant Failure Lawsuit?

You may be eligible to file a claim if:

• You underwent Cartiva Implant Surgery – You experienced worsening pain or implant failure.
• You required revision surgery, implant removal, or fusion.
• Your daily activities or work capacity were affected.

Medical documentation plays a crucial role in these cases.

Compensation Available to Cartiva Implant Victims

A successful Cartiva implant failure lawsuit may allow recovery for:

• Follow-up medical care and revision surgeries.
• Physical therapy and mobility aids.
• Lost income or reduced earning ability.
• Ongoing pain and emotional distress.
• Permanent foot impairment.

Each case is evaluated individually based on injury severity.

Time Limits: Why Acting Now Matters

Product liability lawsuits are subject to strict filing deadlines. In many states, the statute of limitations begins when the injury is discovered—not when the implant was placed.

Waiting too long could permanently bar your claim.

Steps to Take If You Suspect Implant Failure

• Consult an orthopedic specialist for evaluation.
• Request copies of operative reports and scans.
• Keep a symptom journal documenting pain levels.
• Speak with a lawyer experienced in medical device litigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has the Cartiva implant been discontinued?
The implant is still in use in some settings, though patient complaints and lawsuits continue to rise.

Can I sue without revision surgery?
Yes. While revision surgery strengthens a case, documented failure and pain may still qualify.

Are Cartiva implant failure lawsuits grouped together?
Some claims may be consolidated, while others proceed individually depending on jurisdiction.

Conclusion

The Cartiva implant failure lawsuit underscores the importance of transparency in medical device safety. Patients trusted this implant to restore mobility—not create lifelong pain.

If you are living with complications after Cartiva implant surgery, understanding your legal rights may help you pursue accountability and compensation.

Patients trusted the Cartiva implant to preserve mobility — not to cause worsening pain, repeat surgeries, and permanent loss of function.